ASM / PSG: Why the VAR did not return to the violent tackle on Lucas Chevalier

PSG’s defeat at AS Monaco (1-0) in Ligue 1 was marked by a controversial refereeing determination. Regardless of a harmful deal with on Lucas Chevalier, referee Clément Turpin, then the VAR, didn’t impose the slightest sanction. This new refereeing scandal as soon as once more raises the query of the usage of video help in the case of Paris Saint-Germain. Evaluation of a flagrant injustice.

The match between AS Monaco and PSG left a bitter style, and never solely due to the ultimate rating. One motion particularly is on the coronary heart of all of the discussions on the internet and locally of Parisian supporters: this harmful deal with, worthy of an assault, on goalkeeper Lucas Chevalier by a Monegasque participant, which brought on professional concern. On the pitch, the fault appeared apparent, endangering the bodily integrity of the younger goalkeeper. But it surely’s what occurs subsequent that’s most dismaying. The person in black, Clément Turpin, selected to not intervene. Much more critical, the VAR (Video Help to Refereeing) group, imagined to right apparent errors, remained surprisingly silent.

The absence of a Crimson Card: In different championships, and even different Ligue 1 matches, such a gesture is punished in an exemplary method. How might such a breach of the rules be ignored? The silence of the VAR: The VAR protocol stipulates that it should intervene for violent actions or clear and apparent errors regarding a purple card. The truth that the video assistant didn’t name the principle referee to assessment the motion on display screen raises deep unease.

PSG, favored goal of refereeing controversies?

This case is sadly not remoted. For the reason that arrival of Qatari funds, the sensation of double-speed arbitration in France is a chorus well-known to Paris Saint-Germain followers. Every season brings its share of questionable selections, which at all times appear to go within the course of disfavoring the capital membership. The non-intervention of the VAR on this particular case in Monaco is a worrying sign. Is that this incompetence? Or is there a tacit instruction to be cautious in the case of a contentious motion involving the French champion membership? The commentary is overwhelming: When the sport is stopped for lengthy minutes for much less critical conditions, the pace with which this apparent fault was brushed apart is placing. The requirement for transparency promised by the introduction of video expertise is, as soon as once more, not there.

Ought to PSG make itself heard extra? Ought to we demand extra readability from the authorities? What is definite is that so long as such selections proceed to make headlines, the controversy over the equity of refereeing in Ligue 1 will solely intensify, and the frustration of PSG supporters will stay excessive.