Chelsea left a bit fragile after failing to address key area in the summer

Chelsea’s summer season switch window for me was round a 6/10. I consider we did numerous good enterprise and among the outgoing offers we did had been unimaginable. However there are such a lot of query marks nonetheless hovering round among the incoming enterprise we did, and the incoming enterprise we didn’t do.

For me, there are lots of dangers, and I’ve honed in on an article I stumbled throughout this week for some debate.

“Chelsea’s switch window left them in a fragile place, to place it flippantly, and the latest 2-2 draw in opposition to Brentford has illustrated this damningly,” writes Henry (@CFCAnalytic) of LondonsFirst this week.

“I feel it’s a sound declare to recommend that Chelsea ought to by now have a squad able to competing for the title at a minimal.

“I feel it’s protected to say Chelsea aren’t fairly there on all three fronts, regardless of the mass funding.

“Chelsea supplied a efficiency baseline final season that indicated they’re in all probability loads nearer to a title than many assume.

“Chelsea ended up coming fourth with 69 factors. Not vastly spectacular, although assuming they don’t go a complete month of tough type, that may simply be 5-10 factors increased.

“With a stronger squad this season, the naked minimal factors goal, for me, needs to be round 75 factors.

“However, as hinted at, that is closely reliant on one factor – the health of our squad.

“Whereas there have been enhancements to the squad, Chelsea nonetheless await the vast majority of incomings to settle in correctly.

“The staff can be skinny in key positions, like centre again and in assault, particularly with the frequent accidents to Wesley Fofana, Benoit Badiashile, and the present damage to Liam Delap.

“It’s this ‘thinness’ and reliance on health that can doubtless decide how the season will go.

“After all, almost all prime groups will undergo massively if they’ve accidents to their prime gamers.

“However for my part, Chelsea’s particular scenario is extra ‘flimsy’. With the added damage of Levi Colwill, Chelsea’s defence lies within the palms of Trevoh Chalobah, Tosin Adarabioyo, and Josh Acheampong.

“It’s an unlucky actuality that not one of the three are of the standard but to be at a prime degree all through the whole season.

“This thinness of depth can be prevalent up prime. With Delap’s damage, Chelsea’s solely actual ‘9’ is Marc Guiu.

“Guiu was signed as a market alternative for £5m in Summer time 2024. Though he has good hanging fundamentals, is much from even a brief time period resolution.

“Whereas there are actually squad deficiencies, Maresca can’t afford to slide into the poor rotation rhythm he had final 12 months and should begin together with gamers like Andrey Santos extra.

“Maresca has certainly been left in a dodgy place. No correct CCB means his choices to progress from the again are restricted.

“Marc Guiu isn’t a top-level striker but. The squad he’s been given is actually ok for a top-four end, however asking him to realize extra can be disingenuous.

“If accidents worsen, we merely can’t blame Maresca. It might be unfair.

“And the true individuals we needs to be blaming can be the administrators who took huge dangers this switch window.”

I fee numerous this and agree with most of what Henry has mentioned. What about you?