Benfica denounces Valverde to UEFA for alleged aggression

Benfica has determined to make a transfer and file a proper grievance with UEFA for an motion carried out by Fede Valverde within the ultimate stretch of the primary leg performed by Actual Madrid on the Estádio da Luz. The Lisbon membership understands that the Uruguayan midfielder engaged in violent conduct within the 83rd minute, in a play wherein, in line with his model, there was no ball in dispute.

The motion, which went unnoticed by each the referee and the VAR through the improvement of the match, has subsequently been reinterpreted by Benfica as deserving a direct purple card. The Portuguese entity considers that there was a gesture of aggression in the direction of Samuel Dahl and that, no matter whether or not there was no clear or excessive depth affect, the intention ought to have been ample to sanction the expulsion.

After reviewing the pictures and gathering varied referee analyzes revealed in specialised media, the membership maintains that there’s a regulatory foundation to talk of violent conduct. A few of these analyzes publicly level out that the motion would match into the instances that the regulation punishes with expulsion, even when the contact just isn’t notably dramatic, whether it is interpreted that there’s a deliberate act with out the opportunity of contesting the ball.

With this argument, Benfica has transferred the case to the UEFA Disciplinary Committee to judge what occurred and decide whether or not to open a file. The grievance provides a brand new component of rigidity to a tie already stuffed with controversial episodes and with a number of open fronts outdoors the sector of play.

In parallel, the investigation associated to the alleged racist insults attributed to Gianluca Prestianni in the direction of Vinícius Júnior continues, a matter that can be beneath the radar of the competent our bodies. The coincidence of each conditions now forces UEFA to place itself earlier than the second leg on the Santiago Bernabéu Stadium, the place there could possibly be sporting implications if any precautionary measure have been adopted.

The ball, this time, is in UEFA’s court docket. It will likely be the Disciplinary Committee that should analyze the pictures, studies and arguments of the events concerned to resolve if the episode stays a mere interpretative controversy or if, quite the opposite, it leads to a sanction that might alter the aggressive context of the tie.