Atlético de Madrid has undoubtedly uninterested in the fixed refereeing controversies. After two consecutive days during which it had already issued severe warnings via its social networks, first within the derby towards Actual Madrid and, extra just lately, towards FC Barcelona, the entity has determined to take motion in a way more forceful and formal manner. Miguel Ángel Gil Marín, shareholder and CEO of the rojiblanco membership, has stated sufficient. The CEO has exploded publicly, which has led to a agency assertion issued via the official web site of the rojiblanco membership.
A motion that demonstrates the large unrest that’s felt within the workplaces of the Metropolitan. In his statements, Gil Marín has overtly admitted that throughout the crew he feels deep disgrace over the VAR’s rectification of referee Busquets Ferrer. A choice that, based on the board’s perspective, clearly tilted the course and results of the match in favor of the Barça crew.
The dart to the VAR: “Interventionism” and predisposition
When analyzing what occurred on the pitch towards Barcelona, the supervisor put particular concentrate on correcting Gerard Martín’s pink card. He described the motion from the VOR room as a “decisive and interventionist” intervention. In his personal phrases: “After we see the pictures and hearken to the audios shared by the Federation, we are able to solely really feel ashamed. It isn’t potential that they allow us to hearken to their feedback, utterly opposite to what the proper functioning of the VAR must be, and nothing occurs.”

Gil Marín overtly acknowledges that referees have the identical proper to make errors as gamers, coaches or leaders, assuming that errors are a pure a part of the sport. Nevertheless, he attracts a pink line: “One other factor is for a referee from the VAR to predispose the principal when he’s judging an motion.”
From their perspective, the sector referee is the one who should assume duty for making selections, deciphering the intention of the footballers in actual time. The VAR, he emphasizes, must be strictly restricted to correcting factual and non-interpretable errors, avoiding deciding as an alternative of the primary choose.
Comparative grievances and modifications in standards
One other of probably the most vital factors of his speech addresses the inconsistency of the refereeing institution, regretting the totally different standards which might be utilized to equivalent performs. “It isn’t regular that in the identical performs totally different selections are made, the factors are modified and we have no idea what to anticipate. It has occurred to us within the final two days. It doesn’t make sense,” defined the pink and white CEO, reflecting the frustration that prevails within the locker room.
Miguel Ángel Gil: “The VAR ought to solely intervene to right non-interpretable errors”
➡️ https://t.co/I4hvxg6w1y
— Atlético de Madrid (@Atleti) April 5, 2026
To complete off his intervention, he highlighted a really latest comparative grievance that exposes the system. He recalled how the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA) itself defined a couple of days in the past an equivalent motion in a duel between Betis and Rayo Vallecano, making certain then that it ought to have been resolved with a pink card.
“And the worst of all is that the CTA itself explains a play a couple of days in the past, making certain that it must be pink and yesterday, in an equivalent play, the referee makes the proper choice and the VAR leads him into error by exceeding its capabilities. These capabilities which have been defined to us gamers, coaches and managers, and that sadly usually are not fulfilled later,” he said firmly.



























Arsenal






































.jpg?w=120&resize=120,86&ssl=1)








